<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Visualization and Photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://attiev.com/2010/02/10/visualization-and-photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://attiev.com/2010/02/10/visualization-and-photography/</link>
	<description>Beauty in the eye of the beholder</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 01:57:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: attiev</title>
		<link>http://attiev.com/2010/02/10/visualization-and-photography/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>attiev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attiev.com/?p=400#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Yes! I agree! lol... You said it very well. Thanks Brian ;) Yes, you should check out that article. I find it enlightening !-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! I agree! lol&#8230; You said it very well. Thanks Brian <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Yes, you should check out that article. I find it enlightening !-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FS Photography</title>
		<link>http://attiev.com/2010/02/10/visualization-and-photography/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>FS Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attiev.com/?p=400#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t modern technology the best... With programs like photoshop and photomatix, that give us the ability to &quot;tweak&quot; a photograph and make it more pleasing to us... It&#039;s true that opinions vary on what is pleasing to the individual, but at least we have the chance to try the various options out... 

Of course the software doesn&#039;t help you take a good photograph.. But fortunately that&#039;s never been a problem with you, as you have abilities in both fields of expertise... :)

Must go check out that article..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t modern technology the best&#8230; With programs like photoshop and photomatix, that give us the ability to &#8220;tweak&#8221; a photograph and make it more pleasing to us&#8230; It&#8217;s true that opinions vary on what is pleasing to the individual, but at least we have the chance to try the various options out&#8230; </p>
<p>Of course the software doesn&#8217;t help you take a good photograph.. But fortunately that&#8217;s never been a problem with you, as you have abilities in both fields of expertise&#8230; <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Must go check out that article..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: attiev</title>
		<link>http://attiev.com/2010/02/10/visualization-and-photography/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>attiev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attiev.com/?p=400#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Hi there! I see your point. I have several pictures that I love but others might no like them so much and vice-versa. Photography is very subjective. You are on the right spot when you mentioned not all of us like the same thing. Thanks for commenting. Have a great day to you too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there! I see your point. I have several pictures that I love but others might no like them so much and vice-versa. Photography is very subjective. You are on the right spot when you mentioned not all of us like the same thing. Thanks for commenting. Have a great day to you too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sartenada</title>
		<link>http://attiev.com/2010/02/10/visualization-and-photography/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>sartenada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://attiev.com/?p=400#comment-68</guid>
		<description>I am not photographer, no, not at all, but I have seen plenty of photos during my long life.

All of us are not liking same things and many of us see things in different way.

I like the first photo much more than manipulated second photo. The first one is so delicate revealing plant&#039;s fragile structure. The second one is &quot;unclear&quot; and one cannot see the beauty of that nice masterpiece of our mother nature.

I agree with You that the fourth photo is much more better than the third one.

So, this was an opinion of a poor amateur photographer and let us respect each one&#039;s opinion, because the world is woth of it. Have nice day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not photographer, no, not at all, but I have seen plenty of photos during my long life.</p>
<p>All of us are not liking same things and many of us see things in different way.</p>
<p>I like the first photo much more than manipulated second photo. The first one is so delicate revealing plant&#8217;s fragile structure. The second one is &#8220;unclear&#8221; and one cannot see the beauty of that nice masterpiece of our mother nature.</p>
<p>I agree with You that the fourth photo is much more better than the third one.</p>
<p>So, this was an opinion of a poor amateur photographer and let us respect each one&#8217;s opinion, because the world is woth of it. Have nice day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
